UK edition A useful casino review should help a reader judge a claim, including when the available evidence is incomplete. This policy explains the standards I apply to my SpinFormula articles under the name Lucky BetMastermind.
Evidence before conclusions
I give priority to the source best placed to establish the particular fact. A regulator's register can establish what that register records; operator terms can describe published conditions; a cashier visible to an eligible account may establish available payment options. These sources answer different questions and are not interchangeable.
I identify reported third-party assessments as someone else's assessment. Repetition across affiliate pages is not independent confirmation. Where I cannot inspect the relevant live conditions, I say so. I do not substitute assumptions about other casinos for evidence about SpinFormula.
Scope and dates
An article's stated check date refers to the research described there. It is not a guarantee that every offer, term or licence status remains unchanged. I do not change an article's research date merely because the website has been rebuilt or moved to a new server.
When new evidence materially changes a conclusion, the relevant passage should be corrected and its context made clear. Small spelling, formatting and accessibility improvements do not constitute a fresh investigation.
First-hand experience and authorship
I have not personally opened or funded a SpinFormula account, played its games or tested its withdrawals. Statements about another person's experience must remain attributed to that person or source. I do not invent successful withdrawals, support conversations, verification checks or screenshots.
I publish the articles under the author name Lucky BetMastermind. ChatGPT by OpenAI assisted with research organisation and drafting. I disclose that assistance rather than presenting the material as exclusively human-written research. The crest identifies the author; it is not a regulator's mark, an accreditation or a licence seal.
Ratings, images and commercial links
I do not assign a numerical casino score without a defined assessment method. Where a third-party rating appears, the article identifies its source and context. Editorial photographs and diagrams are illustrative and must not be presented as evidence that a casino account was tested.
A commercial relationship must not decide whether an uncertain claim is labelled verified. If a future outbound link carries an affiliate relationship, that relationship should be disclosed beside the recommendation. A link does not establish British authorisation or override the cautions in the review.
Corrections and disagreements
Use the editorial contact form to identify an error. Include the page address, the statement concerned, what you believe is correct, and a public source where possible. I assess the evidence rather than removing a criticism solely because a commercial party dislikes it.
I may decline requests that are abusive, unrelated to the published material or unsupported by evidence. I do not publish a reader's private correspondence or personal documents as a correction. For account disputes, the relevant operator and its applicable complaints process remain the appropriate starting point.